Accredited laboratories

If you cannot prove it, for the audit it never happened

Systems for laboratories that produce traceable results: every measurement with its instrument, its owner, its date and its evidence. We work with calibration, clinical analysis and occupational health labs.

An accredited laboratory does not sell measurements: it sells measurements it can defend. And defending them means being able to show, months later, which instrument was used, who did it, against which standard, and what happened when something fell out of tolerance.

That is what a laboratory system has to solve. The calculation is the easy part; the hard part is having the evidence build itself while the work happens, because assembled by hand on audit day it is worthless.

What happens today

The problems that keep repeating in this field

Traceability lives in spreadsheets

It works until somebody asks about a measurement from eight months ago.

The report is assembled by hand

Copying between files is where the errors that later need explaining are born.

Nobody knows if the instrument was calibrated

Without the due date tied to the measurement, an expired calibration invalidates work retroactively.

You cannot prove who signed

A cell with initials does not prove who wrote it or when.

Clients call to ask

With no portal, every query about a result is a phone call and an email attachment.

Software validation is not documented

The standard requires software validated as fit for use, and that is almost never recorded.

We already built it

Systems running in this field

What gets built

What a system usually solves here

  • Traceability of every measurement: instrument, standard, owner and date
  • Calibration due-date control, with advance warning
  • Reports generated by the system, in the lab's own format
  • QR verification code on the report
  • A portal so clients check their results without calling
  • An audit log of every change
  • A software validation record, with test cases and rounds
  • Workload and billing reports by period

How we do it

The services that apply

Frequently asked

What people ask us most

The system does not accredit: what it does is produce and keep the evidence the standard asks for. We built Sitragol QA precisely to record software validation traceability, which is one of the most frequently missing points.

Yes, and it is the first thing we ask. Every lab has its format, and changing it for the software's is backwards.

They get configured. In GesLaboral, for instance, each medical centre defines its boxes, exam panels and units of measure.

Depends on the instrument. If it exposes data by file or port, it can be read and manual entry avoided — which is where most errors come from.

If you can imagine it, we can build it.

Tell us what you need. We'll get back with a clear proposal, no jargon.